I like this! It's kind of like the X drive concept combined with a built-in app. I can see this being really great for someone who travels a lot and needs to be able to write on the go, especially if they have an editor that they need to work with, too. A travel writer, for example. Or for business travel while simultaneously working on projects back home with a team. Or group work in school, especially if you are doing school long-distance. I assume it has all the same kind of features for editing and sharing that MS Word does, too, with different soloured squiggles and strikethroughs and so on? Fantastic. (Though I did find the limited font choices a little pitiful, given the computing power Google possesses.)
For me, though, there is one thing that just makes me nervous, because I'm paranoid like that. You are entrusting your document and the saving of it to someone else and their servers. Not to say nothing ever happens to, say, a diskette or a USB key, which are other options for portable files, or to other email servers you might save it in as an attachment, but it still would make me nervous if it were important, so I'd likely be saving to two places, just to be on the safe side.
Thursday, October 25, 2007
Monday, October 22, 2007
Delicious.
I must admit, other than using delicious as a way to find things, I'm not really getting this one. The social aspect of it is sort of eluding me. Perhaps because I dont' really care how many other people are looking at something, or whether they like the same thing I've enjoyed? I did find lots of fun stuff under a few headings and set up my own set of tags for them, but I can't see using them for anything beyond portable bookmarks, really.
This is a bit of a lame entry, but really, this particular application isn't ringing my bell.
This is a bit of a lame entry, but really, this particular application isn't ringing my bell.
Wednesday, October 10, 2007
Getting Silly Wit' It
Okay, so this week has all been fun and games.
I am LOVING! the Big Huge Labs tools.
I made a movie poster:
And a caption:
And a motivator:
Can I use that last one in the library?
-------------------------------------------
The generators are great, too. So many things I didn't know, to start with. Like my blues name? Is "Big Mama" Baby Perkins. Which seems a little internally contradictory, but whatever. Apparently I'm an enigma wrapped in a riddle and tied up with a conundrum or something. (Since I refuse to admit to being an oxymoron.)
And I generated some sudoku, since I am, as so many sadly are, completely obssessed. Sigh.
I have also enjoyed the South Park Alice:
and a few other avatar creators and such.And those randomized generators, which are fun for a few moments. Like the motorcycle gang name (The Pea Ridge Mustache Minions Rule!) and the Elizabethan Insult generator. Yes, you heard that right. Thou darest not believe me, thou mewling rough-hewn flap-dragon?!
Oh alright, back to work... Sigh.
Saturday, October 6, 2007
Bloglines
I've actually been using bloglines for a while now to read a large number of blogs, somewhere in the neighbourhood of 40-45 of them, though I try to keep it down. Especially because, on a week like this past one, where I was literally sick all week, I came back to find well over a hundred items! That kind of backlog is a bit nerve-wracking for me because I missed some important news from some people I have come to know through blogs.
I suppose I might feel differently if I were using it for only professional articles, thinking that missing one article about how a librarian in Arkansas was making a difference or something like that, I wouldn't feel as attached to not missing anything. I think though, that to get book reviews, for example maybe SLJ reviews, that way would be really great, because I find the wait for the paper copy to go around to all the branches in the district can be a bit much.
For some professional sites and news-type feeds, too, I find the volume a bit daunting, and sifting through to be annoying. So for those, I still do it the old-fashioned way and go to the website. It would be perfection for a journalist, for the really active bloggers like BoingBoing staff, or for serious news jjunkies, though.
I suppose I might feel differently if I were using it for only professional articles, thinking that missing one article about how a librarian in Arkansas was making a difference or something like that, I wouldn't feel as attached to not missing anything. I think though, that to get book reviews, for example maybe SLJ reviews, that way would be really great, because I find the wait for the paper copy to go around to all the branches in the district can be a bit much.
For some professional sites and news-type feeds, too, I find the volume a bit daunting, and sifting through to be annoying. So for those, I still do it the old-fashioned way and go to the website. It would be perfection for a journalist, for the really active bloggers like BoingBoing staff, or for serious news jjunkies, though.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)